From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 22 01:55:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD99106566C for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluxboxtremist@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3928FC13 for ; Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so342659bwz.13 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:55:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=6oqKVgXVOjit7/70cHhQFtTEToGF7wVV/lLjYXr+U6s=; b=gFZF0iU8nHue3IaIhdq0OLdeyGdn3AwSOYoJI0QNoSamXuZugWdmFGmdA5WD3OM1wi LpjyFRFjEOt8u46sxh6qJBcsNqoMSFTfZ3ITGTX+P093yT6e1SnqWDOKNBCe/muLqqJQ Xx9GKMpiR3cCBvJO1XYae+shtkKdoe8i1hE1A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=R2CWGFFwSEyqEz8WwADAyuPLRP5ZVI1BFCiRbwZnzn9R8RrEiP+O3orK33X3sFk4tA 9xctYAWKWxklCFFPVoVVXFwCeXr4upSn4QTQr2qNf226G/yJE2QjbOi+IbU2HFc0QYe0 ebLMC29is2RldF6zAk8+mAVVIU6xVJvLvjPBg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.118.211 with SMTP id w19mr514323bkq.83.1303435765470; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.68.19 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:29:25 +0000 Message-ID: From: Andres Chavez To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Killing states X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 01:55:59 -0000 hey guys, I'm wondering if there is any way to kill states with pfctl based on port numbers or mask (/etc/services) rather than with labels or hosts specification ? -- * *