From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 20 12:30:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1003E16A4CE for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 12:30:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (cust.94.120.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.94.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD33643D1F for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 12:30:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from [10.0.3.124] (aragorn.lan.elvandar.intranet [10.0.3.124]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A65A10689E; Thu, 20 May 2004 21:30:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <40AD0754.1060504@elvandar.org> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 21:30:28 +0200 From: Remko Lodder X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fernan Aguero References: <40ACCF16.80306@xbsd.org> <20040520190342.GB2784@iib.unsam.edu.ar> In-Reply-To: <20040520190342.GB2784@iib.unsam.edu.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: FreeBSD Ports cc: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: ports/66740: [MAINTAINER] security/f-prot-sig: update to 20040517 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 19:30:39 -0000 Fernan, *stripped your reply since it's huge* I can agree with your proposal, perhaps when stated how critical etc should be used it gets more clear for everyone. A thought: source/ports: stuff totally not functioning anymore, the base system is unable to perform it's normal tasks for docs: Serious: Source/ports: The system is able to run, but has some minor faults that limit the services running on the host.. for docs: The documentation is totally incorrect, telling you to enter yes instead of no on a crucial part of a base application. (giving up security etc). Non critical: source/ports: there are some errors in the make, but the application works, no services are impacted on the base and ports system. for docs: typo's, weird explaination etc. -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder Elvandar.org/DSINet.org www.mostly-harmless.nl Dutch community for helping newcomers on the hackerscene