From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 17 03:01:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA08195 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 03:01:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA08189 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 03:01:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fullermd@futuresouth.com) Received: (from fullermd@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id FAA23652 for hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 05:00:56 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <19981217050055.O5698@futuresouth.com> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 05:00:55 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: rwho idle time limit Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there a reason rwho limits idle time displayed? The precision would seem, from a quick glance at rwhod.c, to be there, and certainly w and finger don't seem to have any troubles. /usr/src/usr.bin/rwho.c: if (aflg) { if (mp->myidle >= 100*60) mp->myidle = 100*60 - 1; if (mp->myidle >= 60) printf(" %2d", mp->myidle / 60); else printf(" "); } else printf(" "); printf(":%02d", mp->myidle % 60); Matt -- Patron Saint of Subsystems-Nobody-Gives-A-Flying-Donkey-Turd-About *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* | FreeBSD; the way computers were meant to be | * "The only reason I'm burning my candle at both ends, is * | that I haven't figured out how to light the middle yet."| * fullermd@futuresouth.com :-} MAtthew Fuller * | http://keystone.westminster.edu/~fullermd | *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message