From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 26 14:58:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E16106566B for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f219.google.com (mail-bw0-f219.google.com [209.85.218.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0B78FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by bwz19 with SMTP id 19so2133474bwz.43 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:58:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sSsdDXC2x99FA0eKQrMLoEQ4jBAqLfTHXI62YZmFmmo=; b=DNIhULUV8+X07pMdECYg3WHoT6yrR3web/ujVZSUkj+ljfkRQa5pmzXqMVUSPHOSqp wxNKFMBZ8/dzFMbtr2TVOj7K3D+w+rS8jE1Gyw621W6NSrPeXbMPCdHXYSiBi3RzsqHC f9/p5AqFaOsHp+PhsahdmMyUKn0W59vo9hPZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=q7ImhMLXkV9lbXWd+ChO9BWdHppp7lJKCTCKocM6DVlypgJcGZiacowvPGJVMmkAGL 3Yp+V+JS2AphdceTXYxGY3n7r9eVgJytpwnXcYCr24kz3kMZuLHspVBh9oHDIJGo5Gn5 loNswcB6mKJIXM8v8aKaHvIgoz/Om0AVd6D50= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.120.16 with SMTP id b16mr2000650bkr.64.1248620313104; Sun, 26 Jul 2009 07:58:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A6C659C.9010600@haruhiism.net> References: <4A6C659C.9010600@haruhiism.net> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 10:58:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4ad871310907260758h31030be1td42d36a59faf2cf2@mail.gmail.com> From: Glen Barber To: Kamigishi Rei , barbara Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: FreeBSD-8 and portsnap X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 14:58:34 -0000 On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Kamigishi Rei wrote: > barbara wrote: >> >> If you remove those files and run portsnap fetch update again, you will >> find only fresh INDEX-[5-7]. >> Maybe it's caused by the fact INDEX-8 is not built on portsnap servers, >> but I really don't know. >> > > Apparently, I can confirm this. > I use portsnap fetch extract to populate my /usr/ports tree on all my > systems, and on 8-CURRENT machines 8-INDEX seems missing. > Out of curiosity, does 'portsnap fetch update -I' restore INDEX-8? I am not in front of my machine to test, at the moment. -- Glen Barber