From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 1 21:46:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BC41065673 for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECD28FC1A for ; Wed, 1 Jul 2009 21:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 12383 invoked by uid 399); 1 Jul 2009 21:46:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 1 Jul 2009 21:46:23 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A4BD926.2090002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:46:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Jennejohn , Marcelo Araujo , Alexey Dokuchaev , cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org References: <200906301428.n5UESfiF022149@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090701073752.GA79351@FreeBSD.org> <20090701104451.GA1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> <20090701133107.4d952dde@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090701115538.GB1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20090701115538.GB1241@ponderosa.intelbras.com.br> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/lzip Makefile distinfo X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:46:34 -0000 Project tradition dictates that if a maintainer submits a change there is no need to add "Approved by: maintainer" in the cvs log. Even though it's just one line, less repo bloat is a good thing. :) If you were concerned that the final version submitted by the maintainer is different than that in the PR, noting _that_ fact in the commit log would probably be useful. hope this helps, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection