From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 14:29:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0639416A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:29:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A885043D2F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:29:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BD9488AD for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010374pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.69]) by panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8962AA48 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AqgO7-00078M-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:29:51 -0500 From: stan To: FreeBSD Ports List Message-ID: <20040210222951.GB27223@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Ports List References: <20040210180238.GA16205@teddy.fas.com> <40291E81.6010803@math.missouri.edu> <20040210132410.F90776@blues.jpj.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040210132410.F90776@blues.jpj.net> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 17:27:35 up 37 days, 4:31, 1 user, load average: 0.25, 0.11, 0.02 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Re: Problems (linux emulation?) building Openoffice 1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:29:58 -0000 On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:26:46PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > stan wrote: > > > > > > It's possible that teh problem amy be with the linux emulation. I say that > > > because while I was doing portupgrade on this machien, last weekeend, I was > > > prompted yo manually crate a null device in the "chroot's home of Linux > > > emulation". Not knowing where the default for this is, I just hit return, > > > and it appeared that the build wnet OK, but ... > > > > > > Yes, I have loaded the linux emulation kernel module, and mounted teh linux > > > procfs: > > > > > > > > > I have noticed that when the linux_base port is installed, that it umounts > > linproc. So maybe even though you mounted linprocfs before you started, by the > > time you get to the build of jdk14, it is no longer mounted. > > It's supposed to mount linproc (or linprocfs) again once the installation > completes. If you have the latest pkg-install and it still doesn't do > this, let me know. > > MD5 (/usr/ports/emulators/linux_base/pkg-install) = > 301f1b59c43944eff156b102b4b16dbd > BTW, do you now where teh default "jail" for linux_base is? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin