Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 12:20:45 +0200 (EET) From: Narvi <narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee> To: Paul Griffith <paulg@interlog.com> Cc: FreeBSD-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, solarisonintel@egroups.com Subject: Re: PPro 200 vs PII 400 Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990315121912.13278G-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.96r.990314163202.19469A-100000@shell1.interlog.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Paul Griffith wrote: > I am looking for any web sites that compares the PPro to the PII. I have a > possible new customer that is looking to replace their PPro 200, with a > PII 400 for about $6000.00 CDN. The problem is they have only 10 Win95 > Clients running a DOS based business app. They have used up 1 GIG on a 2 > GB HD in the last 2 years. Yet the new server includes 2x9.1 GB HD (L0 > Raid). What gets me here is that the person who is trying to sell them > this package didn't even suggest they upgrade their network to 100BaseT, > it's still 10BaseT ! > > Any pointers. I was suggesting they upgrade their network first, then look > at the Server. Nother thing they might want to try is the P-II overdrive that plugs into the PPro socket and runs at 333Mhz. > > Thanks > Paul Griffith <> paulg@interlog.com > Sander There is no love, no good, no happiness and no future - all these are just illusions. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990315121912.13278G-100000>