From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 22:58:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB9B106564A; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:58:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.netplex.net (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0178FC13; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.netplex.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id o8NMitmV003705; Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:44:56 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.netplex.net) X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (mail.netplex.net [204.213.176.10]); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:44:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:44:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Jung-uk Kim In-Reply-To: <201009232220.o8NMK3fX011639@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <201009232220.o8NMK3fX011639@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: threads/150889: PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER + pthread_mutex_destroy() == EINVAL X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:58:42 -0000 On Thu, 23 Sep 2010, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > The following reply was made to PR threads/150889; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Jung-uk Kim > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, > cgf@netapp.com > Cc: > Subject: Re: threads/150889: PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER + pthread_mutex_destroy() == EINVAL > Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:12:02 -0400 > > I was horribly bitten by the incompatibility when I ported IcedTea6 > Java plugin for Linux. Please see my comments in the patch: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/java/openjdk6/files/icedtea.patch?rev=1.2;content-type=text%2Fplain You shouldn't have to call pthread_mutex_init() on a mutex initialized with PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER. Our implementation should auto initialize the mutex when it is first used; if it doesn't, I think that is a bug. You _do have_ to lock the mutex before calling a condition wait, however. This is a POSIX requirement. -- DE