From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 18 07:56:28 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B0F106564A; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:56:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from itetcu@FreeBSD.org) Received: from worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (worf.ds9.tecnik93.com [81.196.207.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9188B8FC12; Wed, 18 May 2011 07:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from User-PC (unknown [81.181.146.246]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by worf.ds9.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A83F722C5547; Wed, 18 May 2011 10:56:27 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 10:56:27 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Alexander Leidinger Message-Id: <20110518105627.0b7afe48.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110517214614.00004f32@unknown> References: <20110517103858.9cccf61a.itetcu@FreeBSD.org> <20110517160141.A1E121CC0B@ptavv.es.net> <20110517214614.00004f32@unknown> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Skype with sound and video support :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 07:56:29 -0000 On Tue, 17 May 2011 21:46:14 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2011 09:01:41 -0700 "Kevin Oberman" > wrote: > > > > Please put the information in this message (or at least most of it) > > into ports/UPDATING so a few less people running old kernels will be > > bitten by the installation of the new Skype port. > > And what about a wiki page? This way we can extend it in case something > important is uncovered. I'm not opposed to it, but I don't see the need for it at this time. (Plus, I'd like to keep everything inside the port - hence the longish pkg-message - less steps to go through this way). -- Ion-Mihai Tetcu