From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 10:27:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7CD16A419 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F7F13C43E for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0JUH00FUG6EK4RG0@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for chat@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:27:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0BARsc5011722; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:27:55 -0500 Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 05:27:54 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <86ejcofyp3.fsf@ds4.des.no> To: =?UTF-8?B?RGFnLUVybGluZyBTbcO4cmdyYXY=?= Message-id: <478744AA.2010104@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 References: <200801101717.m0AHHHmF068362@fire.js.berklix.net> <4786C660.40103@chuckr.org> <86ejcofyp3.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) Cc: Chuck Robey , Julian Stacey , chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why the FreeBSD license will not be changing X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:27:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Chuck Robey writes: >> what wee need is a rule, that if you demand folks should move the >> thread to such-and-such a list, that YOU ACTUALLY DO THAT. I >> will admit, Julian, you came closest, you at least posted to >> -chat, would have been pretty good, if only you'd removed >> -current before you sent it. Why do folks always insist on the >> other fellow do what you won't do? > > SOP is to Bcc: the old list and mention the move at the top of your > email. A very good purposal was made on the -current@ portion of the thread to make a -legal@ list... as the OP said there it is more then just this issue there are other legal issues that have nothing to do with this thread there are other "more" legit issues (see their post for details)... hopefully for everyone's sanity the list does get made. - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Developer Tools. http://www.flosoft-systems.com Developer, not business, friendly. "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHh0SqjRvRjGmHRgQRAjo9AKCpNIc+ynXtz5OiiFom+Itnw7loYwCgp08P z7iLuJ0+zUsonc6sf/cmcos= =KHjj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----