From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 22 13:26:50 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29ECE16A437
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:26:50 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net)
Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1A143D55
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:26:47 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net)
Received: from gw2.local.net (unknown [62.3.210.252])
	by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B854258907
	for <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:26:40 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Greg Hennessy" <Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net>
To: <freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:26:53 -0000
Message-ID: <000001c637b3$a54b0a70$0a00a8c0@thebeast>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: AcY3sBVu3WcCdc32TbmzoC3m7p7LFgAA2Ucg
In-Reply-To: <1140612265.5617.25.camel@localhost.localdomain>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2006 13:26:53.0862 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[A54D5460:01C637B3]
Subject: RE: Dirty NAT tricks
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
	\(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:26:50 -0000

How is this a problem ? Surely the default route is through the tunnel
interface when the tunnel is up ? 

I fail to see how this 'breaks things horribly'. 

> 
> "You have a corporate LAN. You want to set up a VPN (in this case
> OpenVPN) into the LAN for your road-warriors. However, your 
> LAN is numbered with one of the very common private subnets, 
> such as 192.168/16. Your road-warriors often get addresses in 
> the same private subnet from their coffee-shops, and this 
> breaks things horribly."