From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 21:32:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: threads@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338D516A41F; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:32:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from viefep17-int.chello.at (viefep17-int.chello.at [213.46.255.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98A543D46; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:32:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stefan@fafoe.narf.at) Received: from wombat.fafoe.narf.at ([213.47.85.26]) by viefep17-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050819213248.ENNH1234.viefep17-int.chello.at@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:32:48 +0200 Received: by wombat.fafoe.narf.at (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A06732FF; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:32:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 23:32:46 +0200 From: Stefan Farfeleder To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20050819213244.GH77069@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Eischen , threads@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org References: <20050819203807.GG77069@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: threads@freebsd.org, standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 21:32:51 -0000 On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 05:12:48PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:42:34PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > > > > > > > any objections to this patch? It moves the identifiers starting with > > > > MUTEX_ into the BSD namespace. > > > > > > Looks fine to me. I don't even think we should have MUTEX_* > > > around anyways. > > > > But we had those names for quite a while and maybe there are > > applications using them, that's why I provided the compatibility macros. > > Yes, but you wouldn't break ABI by removing them (I'd advocate > doing this in -current). Okay, gone it is ;)