From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 06:10:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D46BE6 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:10:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sergey.dyatko@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com (mail-ee0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2FFF53 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d4so7312eek.36 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:09:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cYnqvCKfnexc5EmpI0SLVu53OGf4cRAjJi3RTpNIoY0=; b=GgGoWYLUyeldEhm6IDe79rBbzyUB/M5ryS+edazmoiNtL2DBoNR45eXjodCwhNp0+A j/Umu+oG6WN/LCByUml/uUdaom6X+Lo/N20X3x8iu+8DSCRVtsgwjScSKZ0hYOBxfnKE /SGoDKFiAUAqIItOmOM4olFL0+B5d3ARShLHmjWYkxRBadwmOJrXTuACDAHF9Iam6OuU I5q+CY8JgQyiJrgVLprk3eF4HsjMS577gWYrqmXT2okRq6+Okd60N6yL455PHSEIHL8e O9xiwx9qEWlRnOmTzA+q0slus2pg4aOlldawSZ+U0geA617/V9YlHwzrijKQib+ENF4E VfuQ== X-Received: by 10.14.174.132 with SMTP id x4mr14393593eel.39.1359094197455; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop (m-s.agava.net. [195.222.84.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm93855eej.6.2013.01.24.22.09.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:09:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 09:09:58 +0300 From: "Sergey V. Dyatko" To: Derek Kulinski Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <20130125090958.2700cc5b@laptop> In-Reply-To: <0c1603f1-a6af-4511-b230-8b791df7f9d7@email.android.com> References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <20130124093846.5e683474@laptop> <0c1603f1-a6af-4511-b230-8b791df7f9d7@email.android.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 06:10:04 -0000 On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:06:47 -0800 Derek Kulinski wrote: > "Sergey V. Dyatko" wrote: > > >You may: > >1/ install subversion on some host/jail > >2/ do svn export ( f.e. svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9 stable_9) > >3/ tar it > >4/ on 'client' fetch(1)/scp/rsync tarball > > > >in that case you don't need svn on 'client', fetch and scp in base :) > > If you go through all of that why not just install the damn svn from > ports? I have svn installed on all my boxes (for src and configs) ;-) > > I think you don't understand the reason why people are asking for > this. I personally experienced the need not long ago. I had stable/9 > branch and wanted to downgrade to 9.0. The entire process went well > until I rebooted the system, to see tons of errors in pretty much > everything that was compiled from ports. Instead recompiling them > from scratch I just decided to go ahead and upgrade to 9.1 which was > not officially released yet. > how in this case you would have helped availability lite-svn-client on base ? > And of course I could not perform svn sw because svn was broken too. r232944 | lev | 2009-04-29 15:11:17 +0300 ... (3) Add STATIC option to build only static binaries [2] ... > And since svn has tons of dependencies it took me nearly an hour to > recompile them (portupgrade and Ruby were broken too). > that's why I don't use portupgrade for a long time;-) use portmaster WTF -- wbr, tiger