From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 29 23:45:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB28516A400; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal2.es.net (postal2.es.net [198.128.3.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D6343D48; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:45:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29]) by postal2.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:45:30 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 50F9745042; Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:45:30 -0700 (PDT) To: pav@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:56:56 +0200." <1146261416.4532.4.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:45:30 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20060429234530.50F9745042@ptavv.es.net> Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: acpi_thermal on nforce 4 board X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:45:35 -0000 > From: Pav Lucistnik > Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 23:56:56 +0200 > > > --=-AXBfqCepZYiuRJ09ZBfx > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Kevin Oberman píše v pá 28. 04. 2006 v 14:53 -0700: > > > It's pretty much a trimmed-down GENERIC + SMP. > > > I get answers for it87, winbond, wl784, but the values return for it87 > > are clearly bogus. winbond and wl784 both give the same answers. > > Then I'm out of luck with xmbmon. A little light just came on for me. Are you running i386 or amd64? Could make a big difference! I am running i386 as I need some ports that don't work right with amd64. Perhaps something in mbmon is not 64-bit ready. If that is the case, a note to the maintainer, and maybe a PR is in order. Likely fairly easy to fix. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634