From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun  7 14:19:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C06227C
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat,  7 Jun 2014 14:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22f.google.com (mail-qa0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B82F2155
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat,  7 Jun 2014 14:19:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id s7so5770338qap.6
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 07 Jun 2014 07:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
 :subject:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=AftwaK6wQAjxlb7zdwqrSQLl+N9GC5ugBXhpq//BN0c=;
 b=s3xSj6gZlAJ6fhgE4SUUR+bqBvg0Fx8cgBAeBS8zHIydnI2rmQTw5PvD4s9L7JIj5Y
 IDxUTmy6QefZbSzROJ3HR10sD4dA9Bw4s7alAgbcrTNxbqZ7lZwk0+Lkn9Zmknn/JkzR
 Wse2Bp295K0lEr04NkGzUaHQ8/KwuI9/rXRUwGYNA09C408fOiu6xwQGS6zZwM46xc/9
 4yrum13hwQDYX4inVNl+eNapir/WzvImqoEOxnU2wNa7TJXc123yy6ijta6Zs3//T0zP
 7IwSDZpgWogcfusB6jf4Xhw2nJrYNXJFxsKKJd3s+Mfi6z6zYh46SdnG2Z1Jb9TZAEdz
 fdNA==
X-Received: by 10.224.161.138 with SMTP id r10mr19335165qax.2.1402150793436;
 Sat, 07 Jun 2014 07:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mozolevsky@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.100.72 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Jun 2014 07:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406070252270.21531@erdgeist.org>
References: <CAAGHsvDhaqQbwir5P+oaH_Qa8VZ0aj9A2SGrn+2shJMQ21B6Jw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.00.1406070252270.21531@erdgeist.org>
From: Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2014 15:19:13 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: S34MlG-f8kmUMOzgaGtP3Qbkumc
Message-ID: <CADWvR2gkeNaeVPizq_VubWhEHy3ywURJOdv9C=6PNybwYyFqRg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Best practice for accepting TCP connections on multicore?
To: Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18
Cc: Hackers freeBSD <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
 Daniel Janzon <janzon@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2014 14:19:54 -0000

On 7 June 2014 01:53, Dirk Engling <erdgeist@erdgeist.org> wrote:

>
> On Sat, 7 Jun 2014, Daniel Janzon wrote:
>
>  Is there any better way than doing the accept() call in one thread and
>> then
>> dispatch it to a thread on another core with any user space method?
>>
>
See C10K problem [1].


Why use accept() and not kevent()? You need to keep it portable?
>

Has anyone rebutted the threads better than events paper[2] yet?



1. http://www.kegel.com/c10k.html

2.
https://www.usenix.org/legacy/events/hotos03/tech/full_papers/vonbehren/vonbehren.pdf


-- 
Igor M.