From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 16:00:38 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D11717 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECBE6307C for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66D08B9C1; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:00:36 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ezjail Handbook section Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 11:06:34 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201408201106.34557.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 20 Aug 2014 12:00:36 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 16:00:38 -0000 On Tuesday, August 19, 2014 6:01:54 pm Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Warren Block wrote: > > > Draft version of an ezjail section for the Handbook Jails chapter: > > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/jails/jails-ezjail.html > > > > This includes a complete setup at the end for running BIND in a jail. > > In addition to a complete jail example, it can also serve as an example of > > how to set up BIND now that the old chroot configuration is no more. > > Asking for review again of the final version at the link above. If > there are no major complaints in the next few days, it will be > committed. It's not clear to me if you need lo1? If you are using aliases on an external interface as you would with a traditional jail then I think you don't need the lo1 interface? Finally, if you haven't tried etcupdate, you should try it and see how it works compared to mergemaster. -- John Baldwin