From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 23 14:25:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4AD37B401; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:25:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359F443FF5; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:25:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from osa@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (osa@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5NLPJUp037390; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:25:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from osa@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from osa@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5NLPIF5037382; Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 14:25:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Sergey A. Osokin" Message-Id: <200306232125.h5NLPIF5037382@freefall.freebsd.org> To: stefan@fafoe.narf.at, osa@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, osa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/53648: lang/TenDRA: reword ${COMMENT} and make portlint happy X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:25:20 -0000 Synopsis: lang/TenDRA: reword ${COMMENT} and make portlint happy State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: osa State-Changed-When: Mon Jun 23 14:23:06 PDT 2003 State-Changed-Why: Looks like you are maintainer of this port, isn't it? So, if yes - what do you think about change MAINTAINER field of Makefile? Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->osa Responsible-Changed-By: osa Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 23 14:23:06 PDT 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Looks like you are maintainer of this port, isn't it? So, if yes - what do you think about change MAINTAINER field of Makefile? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=53648