From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 7 03:32:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1236216A423 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:32:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514C843D49 for ; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 03:32:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 13423 invoked from network); 7 Feb 2006 14:32:24 +1100 Received: from andromeda.lef.com.au (HELO ?10.168.101.24?) (210.8.93.2) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 7 Feb 2006 14:32:24 +1100 Message-ID: <43E814BC.5010604@meijome.net> Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 14:32:12 +1100 From: Norberto Meijome User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060206) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Conflict? :smbfs built in support and mount_smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 03:32:28 -0000 Hi, I had my kernel built with the following options options NETSMB #SMB/CIFS requester options NETSMBCRYPTO #encrypted password support for SMB which I understand adds the support for smbfs into the kernel itself. BUT when using either mount -t smbfs or mount_smfs , I would get: [SOMETHING ELSE HERE, $0 possibly] can't load smbfs: File exists (aprox error ), implying that it was trying to load the smbfs.ko ... but conflicting with the code built into the kernel? The worse part is that the mount command would fail. I commented out those 2 options *only* and everything works fine again. What gives? Beto