From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 01:29:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DBF16A4CE for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 01:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moya.lambermont.dyndns.org (e165253.upc-e.chello.nl [213.93.165.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD4843D1F for ; Wed, 26 May 2004 01:29:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hans@lambermont.dyndns.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moya.lambermont.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318E736402; Wed, 26 May 2004 10:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from moya.lambermont.dyndns.org ([127.0.0.1])port 10024) with ESMTP id 23125-02; Wed, 26 May 2004 10:29:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by moya.lambermont.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E92ED36401; Wed, 26 May 2004 10:29:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 10:29:16 +0200 To: Allan Fields Message-ID: <20040526082916.GB22828@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> References: <40B2FEAF.7050701@alumni.rice.edu> <6.1.0.6.1.20040525091306.0370d840@popserver.sfu.ca> <20040525222645.GA34929@afields.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040525222645.GA34929@afields.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i From: hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616.p5 at lambermont.dyndns.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: anoncvs.FreeBSD.org gone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 08:29:25 -0000 Allan Fields wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 09:17:51AM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: ... >> This may be a silly question, but why do you need anoncvs? ... > anoncvs access might still > be useful for those who don't want to maintain a local mirror but > still desire to use cvs to access the sources (for example: occasional > use, to get specific version of single binary sources, remote use > via slow dial-up [me a few years back], just to look at logs, etc.) Exactly. I prefer shell based cvs commands to occasionally check source changes and commit logs when I up my -current laptop. Keeping a complete repository around is not an option; my laptop's disk is too small, and I upgrade on different places, so I don't always have a fat disk around on another system. -- Hans