From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 15 16:49:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03C116A4CE for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:49:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5B543D2D for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:49:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1BB621C0008E for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:49:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id E51101C000B6 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:49:41 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050215164941938.E51101C000B6@mwinf1112.wanadoo.fr Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:49:41 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <802915606.20050215174941@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4211CD96.9000200@nbritton.org> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641AFF@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <4211CD96.9000200@nbritton.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:49:43 -0000 Nikolas Britton writes: > Create a subproject disto ("lite fork") of FreeBSD that is tuned for the > desktop and has the needed hardware support, sort of like the old BSD > patch sets. Or completely fork the project into something like > "DesktopBSD". Also a good thing to do is pool all the resources of all > the BSDs into creating a co-opt common DesktopBSD OS. Is also could be a > commercial project/product. I think the project (if it were ever undertaken) should be completely and permanently separated from the current server-oriented FreeBSD. If people want to make a mess modifying the OS for desktop use, let them do it in their own sandbox, and leave the current FreeBSD alone. -- Anthony