From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 10 20:04:17 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D55676;
 Fri, 10 May 2013 20:04:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B5F5E8;
 Fri, 10 May 2013 20:04:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r4AK49Xj002077;
 Sat, 11 May 2013 00:04:09 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
 by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r4AK49OU002076;
 Sat, 11 May 2013 00:04:09 +0400 (MSK)
 (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to
 glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 00:04:09 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To: Spil Oss <spil.oss@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Problems with ipfw/natd and axe(4)
Message-ID: <20130510200409.GT15182@FreeBSD.org>
References: <CAEJyAvOZ6fW0i3yT_D4fH1huje-qsJwA7GGeXqAO1PKzge-YNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130415015850.Y56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <CAHu1Y73Xu64NY1B=idaKmHKDGOB3AHbcXKi4A48-SNkhJrMy6Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130415160625.K56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <CAEJyAvP-4FZ7eZ0o4c3qMzC0nY_gT4GfS3KjBVQiuzNY3aXz4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEJyAvMGKr9gZEEhg2KCD2FkZ=F4Xbx20v8iWyu8hhA_Pq8phw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20130417133637.W56386@sola.nimnet.asn.au>
 <CAEJyAvO_KA8dYSLkFXCoBqcogTkurBX_X=KZn25R4MKoeUGaVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEJyAvNL4NWmm8BMGkT6usZgGt2VWJNqQXeXBgYY9+MiNoUBVw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEJyAvNL4NWmm8BMGkT6usZgGt2VWJNqQXeXBgYY9+MiNoUBVw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 20:04:17 -0000

  Spil,

On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 09:06:35AM +0200, Spil Oss wrote:
S> There seems to be quite a bit of overhaul on the firewall code, pf and
S> ipfw have been moved to sys/netpfil? Can there be some regressions in
S> there that I hit?

Yes, a regression is possible there. However, the issue seems to be
axe(4) specific, since there are no reports on more common NICs.

S> Just upgraded to r250404 but that does not help. Should I file a PR?

Having a PR, with all information gathered in one report,  is definitely
better than not having one.


-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.