From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 28 21:24:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E1C1065672 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 21:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [192.147.25.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1CD8FC24 for ; Thu, 28 May 2009 21:24:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from 76-205-169-61.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net ([76.205.169.61]:36752 helo=borg) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1M9n57-00091T-40; Thu, 28 May 2009 16:24:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:23:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Larry Rosenman Sender: ler@borg To: Ruben van Staveren In-Reply-To: <0633EFA5-4146-40E8-87E0-B72DC87D6BE7@verweg.com> Message-ID: References: <4A1D6F36.3030008@ibctech.ca> <22308B21-1346-4FE5-8332-EB107E9CBD2A@dragondata.com> <36A9C654-D762-4437-9CB1-E235CC6407EC@verweg.com> <2e77fc10905281033v412a6ce6x42f138e0d9e71b32@mail.gmail.com> <0633EFA5-4146-40E8-87E0-B72DC87D6BE7@verweg.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-LERCTR-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.3/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER=0.135, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, TW_ZF=0.077 X-LERCTR-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.3/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER=0.135, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931, TW_ZF=0.077 DomainKey-Status: no signature Cc: FreeBSD , Steve Bertrand , Kevin Day Subject: Re: I've borked my ZFS system upgrading to -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:24:13 -0000 On Thu, 28 May 2009, Ruben van Staveren wrote: > > > On 28 mei 2009, at 19:33, Niki Denev wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> Just curious... doesn't a "zfs upgrade -a" do the same thing? > > The zpool upgrade is just for the pools, but the filesystems keep their > original settings so we need to do that in a seperate move There is both a zpool upgrade and a zfs upgrade command. The zfs upgrade does the filesystems, and the zpool upgrade does the pool. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893