From owner-freebsd-net Tue Dec 11 9:27: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0FB37C12D for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:22:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fBBHMZ057168; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:22:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id fBBHMU706558; Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:22:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 09:22:30 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200112111722.fBBHMU706558@vashon.polstra.com> To: net@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Cc: rizzo@aciri.org Subject: Re: do we really need NETISR_foo == AF_foo ? In-Reply-To: <20011210210625.A16280@iguana.aciri.org> References: <20011210210625.A16280@iguana.aciri.org> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <20011210210625.A16280@iguana.aciri.org>, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > However, I was wonder if it is really necessary that NETISR_foo has > the same value as AF_foo, or it is possible to shift up values and > fill holes to free the last bit ? I've never been able to find any reason at all why the NETISR and AF constants have to be the same. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message