Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 22 Oct 1998 16:06:21 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com>
To:        eric@tarsier.domain.net (eric)
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: possible CAM problem, ahc/st34371w
Message-ID:  <199810222206.QAA18785@panzer.plutotech.com>
In-Reply-To: <19981022145640.55552@tarsier.domain.net> from eric at "Oct 22, 98 02:56:40 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
eric wrote...
> 
> Incidentally, does option "FAILSAFE" still disable t.c.q. ? 

No.  Someone else brought it up a few weeks ago, but I think it's a bad
idea to do it.  FAILSAFE is defined in GENERIC, and if we disable tagged
queueing when it's defined, 90% of users will be running with tagged
queueing turned off.  (and therefore 90% of users will have sucky
performance)

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@plutotech.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810222206.QAA18785>