Date: Thu, 22 Oct 1998 16:06:21 -0600 (MDT) From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@plutotech.com> To: eric@tarsier.domain.net (eric) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: possible CAM problem, ahc/st34371w Message-ID: <199810222206.QAA18785@panzer.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: <19981022145640.55552@tarsier.domain.net> from eric at "Oct 22, 98 02:56:40 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
eric wrote... > > Incidentally, does option "FAILSAFE" still disable t.c.q. ? No. Someone else brought it up a few weeks ago, but I think it's a bad idea to do it. FAILSAFE is defined in GENERIC, and if we disable tagged queueing when it's defined, 90% of users will be running with tagged queueing turned off. (and therefore 90% of users will have sucky performance) Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810222206.QAA18785>