From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 21:47:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B89516A4DD for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:47:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from caelian@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8824643D4C for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from caelian@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c63so1930425pyc for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:47:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=uOQm7SEh0MGdxHPmk+8b23m/EEg6lhNxJz93gGlqoMOtf4rtOyAMhyQeh8tXDHfYxdJLTJPBj7wrL8ibgmGpyLO2AtqRHy9MGiJuunRmtrVDPy+o6dR8XGQStLOJ7w1FzfKdindvBvrI+GMdz37mhydvrgI8phhe3jN7OSwB4us= Received: by 10.65.59.20 with SMTP id m20mr5854180qbk; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.21? ( [84.129.255.195]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e19sm167843qba.2006.08.20.14.47.38; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 14:47:39 -0700 (PDT) From: "Pascal G. Hofstee" To: Wesley Shields In-Reply-To: <20060820211351.GA12681@atarininja.org> References: <4ac1e6310608190708k548a0a8ewf750669c9a98bc1b@mail.gmail.com> <20060820211351.GA12681@atarininja.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 23:47:34 +0200 Message-Id: <1156110455.1161.1.camel@chekov> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.7.91 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lang/mono X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:47:41 -0000 On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 17:13 -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > It's broken on -CURRENT for amd64 and has been for a while. This has > been brought up on the BSD# mailing list recently and, according to > people on that list, appears to be broken due to jemalloc. Which btw, in no way implies that jemalloc is "wrong" here .. but more that mono's internals make false assumptions with regard to the size of pointers on amd64. -- Pascal Hofstee