From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Nov 25 13:54:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7484437B401 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:54:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from the-frontier.org (ns1.the-frontier.org [216.86.199.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF53A43E88 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:54:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pscott@skycoast.us) Received: from ns1.the-frontier.org (pscott@ns1.the-frontier.org [216.86.199.114]) by the-frontier.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10750 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:54:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pscott@skycoast.us) Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:54:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Paul A. Scott" X-Sender: pscott@hercules.the-frontier.org To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ctm In-Reply-To: <20021125214518.A1246@goku.kasby> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've read > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ctm.html and it's not clear to me why anyone would use ctm over cvs. Seems to me that cvs provides far more than ctm, but since ctm has been around since FreeBSD 2.0, there must be some value to it. So, what's the point of ctm? vs. cvs? Thanks, Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message