From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 20:16:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C832106567B for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C4F8FC14 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 20:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E24C28427; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 22:16:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (static-84-242-120-26.net.upcbroadband.cz [84.242.120.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9D97D28426; Tue, 5 Jun 2012 22:16:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FCE6931.6010901@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:16:49 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.19) Gecko/20110420 Lightning/1.0b1 SeaMonkey/2.0.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastian Stach References: <4FCE37FC.1090405@gmail.com> <878874BA-2F5C-4A7E-8690-2A8A96536AE0@t-online.de> In-Reply-To: <878874BA-2F5C-4A7E-8690-2A8A96536AE0@t-online.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:16:53 -0000 Sebastian Stach wrote: > I have an X9SCA-F board and recently updated the BIOS to version 2.0 (the .508 BIOS file). > Its not the same board as yours but maybe the you have the same problem. When i downloaded > the BIOS from the Supermicro website on May 23 the included AMI.BAT only updated the BIOS > and not the Intel ME BIOS extension. [...] There is a differenc between X9SCM-F and X9SCA-F. The SCM version has 82579V and 82574L NIC, but X9SCA-F has both NICs 82574L. And as I read about some problems with 82579V on the net, I bought X9SCA-F few weeks ago. I didn't notice any problem. Can you describe the conditions when you have some network problems so I can do some tests? I am running FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE for testing, not heavily loaded. Miroslav Lachman > Am 05.06.2012 um 18:46 schrieb Johan Hendriks: > >> hello all. >> >> i have a new board the supermicro X9SCM-F with the latest firmware 508. >> I am having some trouble with the onboard intel nics. >> It only activate one nic. >> From dmesg >> >> em0: port 0xf020-0xf03f mem 0xf7800000-0xf781ffff,0xf7825000-0xf7825fff irq 20 at device 25.0 on pci0 >> em0: Using an MSI interrupt >> em0: Setup of Shared code failed >> device_attach: em0 attach returned 6 >> ehci0: mem 0xf7824000-0xf78243ff irq 16 at device 26.0 on pci0 >> usbus0: EHCI version 1.0 >> usbus0: on ehci0 >> pcib2: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 >> pci2: on pcib2 >> pcib3: irq 16 at device 28.4 on pci0 >> pci3: on pcib3 >> em1: port 0xd000-0xd01f mem 0xf7700000-0xf771ffff,0xf7720000-0xf7723fff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 >> em1: Using MSIX interrupts with 3 vectors >> em1: Ethernet address: 00:25:90:75:c8:08 >> >> pciconf -vl >> >> em0@pci0:0:25:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00008086 chip=0x15038086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> device = '82579V Gigabit Network Connection' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >> >> >> em1@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x020000 card=0x000015d9 chip=0x10d38086 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 >> vendor = 'Intel Corporation' >> device = '82574L Gigabit Network Connection' >> class = network >> subclass = ethernet >>