From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 14 20:58:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1D71065673 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A218FC21 for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snoogles.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B803B1CD97; Mon, 14 Jul 2008 12:58:35 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 22:58:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200807082011.23341.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807142258.34757.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Vincent Barus Subject: Re: difference between loading kernel module during boot and after boot manually? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:58:36 -0000 On Monday 14 July 2008 20:29:07 Vincent Barus wrote: > On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 8:11 PM, Mel wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 July 2008 16:48:26 Vincent Barus wrote: > >> does anyone have an idea what's the difference or what _could_ be the > >> difference on loading a kernel module during boot or manually? > > > > There's one major difference. File systems aren't mounted at loader > > stage, so any reference to modules/libraries that exist on a different > > partition, will fail. > Right now i have only one partition and the same problem occurs. Other > modules e.g. for sound or the nvidia module work as a charm. > So I think that's not the only difference. > I can live with a module loaded at the end of the boot process/after > login but I don't think that's the real solution. Hmm, I can only guess here. Is the machine booting to xorg? As in, is the nvidia card actually initialized, not just in VGA mode? If so, does it work when it stays in console mode and/or when nvidia.ko is removed from the loaded modules? -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part.