Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 02:54:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: osa@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile (fwd) Message-ID: <20030830025225.D15016@znfgre.qbhto.arg>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Can someone please explain to me why fixing a plist necessitates bumping
portrevision? If I already have the port installed, the plist is already
broken. There is nothing about this fix that makes me want to reinstall
the port.
IMO, people bump portrevision WAY WAY too often, causing a lot of wasted
time for people needlessly updating ports that work exactly the same
after the upgrade.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Sergey A. Osokin <osa@FreeBSD.org>
To: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 06:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: cvs commit: ports/graphics/netpbm Makefile
osa 2003/08/29 06:10:13 PDT
FreeBSD ports repository
Modified files:
graphics/netpbm Makefile
Log:
Bump PORTREVISION, which I forgot to do in previous commit (fix pkg-plist).
Notify from: sf
Revision Changes Path
1.77 +1 -0 ports/graphics/netpbm/Makefile
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/graphics/netpbm/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.76&r2=1.77&f=h
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030830025225.D15016>