From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 00:56:43 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A47316A417; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from gnome.kiev.sovam.com (gnome.kiev.sovam.com [212.109.32.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2548613C4B5; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:56:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.197]) by gnome.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Il6mN-0007EB-J0; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:59 +0300 Received: from [212.82.216.226] (helo=deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Il6mM-0000cc-9a; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:58 +0300 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9PHjtqM088446; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l9PHjtkU088445; Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:55 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:45:55 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: Roman Divacky Message-ID: <20071025174555.GU2012@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <20071024132656.tz1wjruoocg8g8o8@intranet.encontacto.net> <20071025090136.GA1941@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0rpW5bEisVBStM29" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071025090136.GA1941@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Scanner-Signature: a8c813420754d5015e2a5a3aeed75c84 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 1674 [Oct 25 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Which "linux emulation" works with which programs or the inverse? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 00:56:43 -0000 --0rpW5bEisVBStM29 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:01:36AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > on the state of flash9 in linuxulator... > > I tried to debug it but it's (firefox+flash9) a huge program that > generates like 1.5 million of lines of trace. I spend several hours > staring at that but didn't find anything obvious... I would be more > than happy if someone proved I am stupid and I overlooked something > trivial :) > > now the flash9 work is mostly stalled (on my side) as I have some > personal life issues + I am clueless about how to crack the flash9 > nut. I guess once dtrace is imported to FreeBSD I'll be curious enough > to try it on the flash9 problem.. > > thats how it is :( Did you tried to run the glibc test suite ? --0rpW5bEisVBStM29 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHINZSC3+MBN1Mb4gRAg3rAJoD6p3cRWmNIb23FcpmoRpEgQxd2QCgo6zA 6FoOLRdf0sAYuX8ZYc+lhSc= =lStc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0rpW5bEisVBStM29--