From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 14 11:28:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 55CFD16A4CE; Fri, 14 May 2004 11:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (guru164.netsonic.fi [194.29.193.164])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 77B2843D49; Fri, 14 May 2004 11:28:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk)
Received: from vimes.int.athame.co.uk ([192.168.1.3])
	by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD)
	id 1BOhQT-0007kV-DF; Fri, 14 May 2004 21:28:53 +0300
From: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk>
Organization: Being Lazy At Home (BLAH!)
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD ports <ports@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 21:29:10 +0300
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <200405141700.i4EH0gSp024041@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<200405141036.12208.ringworm@inbox.lv> <40A50E0A.6060405@fillmore-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <40A50E0A.6060405@fillmore-labs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200405142129.10156.andy@athame.co.uk>
cc: "Michael C. Shultz" <ringworm@inbox.lv>
Subject: Re: x11-wm/xwmm [WAS: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:28:56 -0000

On Friday 14 May 2004 21:20, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Michael C. Shultz wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > ===>   xwmm-0.7_1 depends on shared library: qt2.4 - not found
> > ===>    Verifying install for qt2.4 in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt23
> > ===>  Vulnerability check disabled
> >
> >                       NOTICE
> >
> > You have QT3 files installed!  Installing this port
> > will result in conflicts between QT3 and QT2!
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /speed/usr.ports/x11-toolkits/qt23.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /speed/usr.ports/x11-wm/xwmm.
> > mike:/usr/ports/x11-wm/xwmm>
> >
> >
> > My question is, should a PR be submitted requesting this port be
> > dropped? I know I don't want QT2 on my system and assume most
> > others feel the same way. If a PR is appropriate to request this
> > port be dropped I'll be happy to submit it.
>
> This would be a request to drop x11-toolkits/qt23 and dependent
> ports, which you should discuss on kde@ first.

kde@ no longer maintain qt23 &c.

As far as we are concerned, it's orphaned, and if someone else wants to 
maintain it they can.

Regards,

Andy
(one of kde@)

-- 
Andy Fawcett                                     | andy@athame.co.uk
                                                 | tap@kde.org
"In an open world without walls and fences,      | tap@lspace.org
  we wouldn't need Windows and Gates."  -- anon  | tap@fruitsalad.org