Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 08:34:14 -0500 From: "Steve Sims" <SimsS@IBM.Net> To: "The Hermit Hacker" <scrappy@hub.org>, "Joe Greco" <jgreco@solaria.sol.net> Cc: "Joe McGuckin" <joe@via.net>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CCD questions (news server) Message-ID: <199701101335.NAA140969@smtp-gw01.ny.us.ibm.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > > I arbitrarily set the interleave to 64. Is there a good method to derive > > > the optimal interleave factor? > > > > You are killing your performance with such a low number. > > > Now I'm curious, what interleave are you using? I don't assume its > possible to *change* the interleave once the device is created, is it? I'm > running even lower (32), since...well...I didn't know better :( > > Should maybe add a note to the man page that states a recommended > value for a news server, or something like that? :) > For what it's worth, I've been playing (in the strictest sense of the word, not actually *knowing anything* about ccd ;-) with CCD and various interleave values. Empirically (using `iozone`) I've decided that performance appears to "balance peak" (i.e.: best tradeoff between optimized read and optimized write speeds) when the interleave value specified will *not quite* fill the on-drive cache. So, with a farm of el-cheapo antique drives w/128K on-drive cache, I used an interleave of 240. Tweaking the interleave value higher bumps up the write performance but reading suffers. Moving the interleave downward didn't significantly help reading or writing performance. (Although some settings caused the array to lose, big time!) N.B.: This is in a plain-vanilla 4-drive, one controller, ccd configuration: No mirroring, no CCDF_SWAP or CCDF_UNIFORM flags. I'd have to play some to benchmark these. I briefly tested a configuration with dual Seagate 12550N's, one with 512K and one with 1M (!) on-drive cache and the result was similar; performance "balanced" best with an interleave of around 1000 (which is just under the size of the smaller cache). YMMV, I learned a "lot" by just playing with the values and newfs'ing. ...sjs...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199701101335.NAA140969>