From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 13 18:17:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712A416A41C; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:17:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [213.46.255.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C8543D55; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:17:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu) Received: from [80.98.207.149] by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20050613181746.IBMH29474.viefep20-int.chello.at@[80.98.207.149]>; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:17:46 +0200 Message-ID: <42ADCDC7.2090700@t-hosting.hu> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 20:17:43 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <42ADC155.10304@t-hosting.hu> <20050613174248.GA85674@dan.emsphone.com> <42ADC908.6060505@t-hosting.hu> <20050613180721.GA62239@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20050613180721.GA62239@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Makefile question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:17:49 -0000 Yes, it worked when I specified it by hand. But Johnny has found out what was the problem. The bsd.port.mk file overrides the prefix, thus I had to specify my CONFIGURE_ARGS after the include line. Cheers, Gábor Kövesdán Dan Nelson wrote: >Yes, that should have worked. Does it do what you want if you manually >run ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/appname ? If not, then the >configure script of the Makefile is broken, and you will need to patch >it or install the files yourself. > > >