From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Jul 18 10:14:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-62.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B86C37B403 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:14:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBCB2674FF; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:14:41 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: janb@cs.utep.edu Cc: Stefan Molnar , Marek Gorka , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.3 and 6G RAM Message-ID: <20010718101440.C941@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from janb@cs.utep.edu on Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:45:07AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 10:45:07AM -0600, janb@cs.utep.edu wrote: > I am interestied as to why this is. Is there a sound technical reason do > not support this, or was it merely the fact that there are not too many > machines that can take advantage of this anyway, and nobody got around to > do this? It requires large changes to the VM system. Kris --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7VcQAWry0BWjoQKURAvPfAJwOrOmznqxzGvpbBbWOJX1QVsPIbACgzoB9 bEvdb3Wg6GHpu3lC1Qw0Ebw= =XOyC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --yLVHuoLXiP9kZBkt-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message