From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 20:38:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5369E106566C; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:38:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:38:15 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4D64FF99.2070908@cabletv.dp.ua> <20110224152759.00003c4e@unknown> <201102241511.24989.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201102241511.24989.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102241538.17592.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Bruce Cran , Mitya , Nathan Whitehorn Subject: Re: Cosmetic path to bsdinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:38:25 -0000 On Thursday 24 February 2011 03:11 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, February 24, 2011 10:27:59 am Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:00:44 -0600 > > > > Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > > Having CAM devices be part of newbus would > > > simplify this a very great deal... > > > > It's required if we're ever going to have suspend/resume working > > properly because currently CAM doesn't get a suspend > > notification, so doesn't know to spin-down disks etc. > > The controllers get a suspend notification though (via > device_suspend() hooks that drivers like mpt, etc. could register > for) and could then use that to post a suspend of the associated > buses. That doesn't require CAM to use new-bus though. FYI, I've been using the following hack for a while now: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ada_suspend.diff Jung-uk Kim