Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:38:15 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Cc: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk>, Mitya <mitya@cabletv.dp.ua>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Cosmetic path to bsdinstall Message-ID: <201102241538.17592.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201102241511.24989.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4D64FF99.2070908@cabletv.dp.ua> <20110224152759.00003c4e@unknown> <201102241511.24989.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 24 February 2011 03:11 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday, February 24, 2011 10:27:59 am Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:00:44 -0600 > > > > Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Having CAM devices be part of newbus would > > > simplify this a very great deal... > > > > It's required if we're ever going to have suspend/resume working > > properly because currently CAM doesn't get a suspend > > notification, so doesn't know to spin-down disks etc. > > The controllers get a suspend notification though (via > device_suspend() hooks that drivers like mpt, etc. could register > for) and could then use that to post a suspend of the associated > buses. That doesn't require CAM to use new-bus though. FYI, I've been using the following hack for a while now: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/ada_suspend.diff Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201102241538.17592.jkim>