From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Jan 29 13:31:22 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA22667
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 13:31:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA22651
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 29 Jan 1997 13:31:15 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199701292131.NAA22651@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA221713349; Thu, 30 Jan 1997 08:29:09 +1100
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: ipdivert & masqd
To: archie@whistle.com (Archie Cobbs)
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 1997 08:29:09 +1100 (EDT)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, archie@whistle.com, ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi,
        brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk, hackers@freebsd.org, cmott@srv.net
In-Reply-To: <199701292016.MAA24360@bubba.whistle.com> from "Archie Cobbs" at Jan 29, 97 12:16:41 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In some mail from Archie Cobbs, sie said:
> 
> The theory was that this loop avoidance was working too well, and
> seemed to be applying to packets other than the one that it was
> supposed to. What I'm trying to prove to myself is that this can't
> be happening.

Does ip_divert_flag get set/reset inside or outside the loop in
ip_input() which dequeues packets ?  (src isn't handy)

Darren