Date: Wed, 14 May 1997 01:56:48 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> Cc: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is Thot (WYSIWIG editor) for you? Message-ID: <14271.863600208@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 May 1997 01:05:50 PDT." <199705140805.BAA03496@rah.star-gate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What I am pitching is for is that if Thot is good we can start advertising it > and hopefully standardize our internal documentation based on its format. > Internal documentation meaning things like : reports, articles, etc... But we already have such a standard and it's called SGML. There would have to be some pretty significant advantages to Thot in order to replace our current doc system and, frankly, I just don't see it happening. Too much work has gone into the existing framework, for one thing. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?14271.863600208>