Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Dec 1995 09:26:39 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com>
To:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: libkern.a going away 
Message-ID:  <13141.819966399@critter.tfs.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 26 Dec 1995 20:29:25 %2B1100." <199512260929.UAA29379@godzilla.zeta.org.au> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm about to nuke libkern.a to ensure that all objects are compiled with
> the correct ${CFLAGS}.  This will also ensure that all objects are
> compiled with the same <sys> and <machine> directories.  Objects that
> are currently in the library will be specified by putting their sources
> in files.${MACHINE}.  The set of necessary objects has to be machine-
> dependent to save space but kernel-independent so that lkms can depend
> on all the necessary functions being present.
> 
> Does anyone want to do this better or differently?
Please go ahead.  Long overdue.
Should we add a semi-mandatory kernel option "GCC" which pulls in the 
stuff gcc needs ?

--
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?13141.819966399>