Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 21:41:19 -0600 From: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update Message-ID: <opr2ba65bb8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <1075000976.48478.68.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> References: <1074887353.768.86.camel@gyros> <20040123201250.GK3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <1074889273.768.101.camel@gyros> <20040123202314.GN3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr2asl1k28ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <20040124210635.GH3365@toxic.magnesium.net> <opr2a94dcg8ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net> <1075000976.48478.68.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 22:22:56 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2004-01-24 at 22:18, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 16:06:35 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> >> wrote: >> >> >>> (01.24.2004 @ 1559 PST): Jeremy Messenger said, in 2.7K: << >> >> On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 15:23:14 -0500, Adam Weinberger >> <adamw@FreeBSD.org> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>(01.23.2004 @ 1521 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.8K: << >> >> >>On Fri, 2004-01-23 at 15:12, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> >> >>> >> (01.23.2004 @ 1449 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.1K: << >> >> >>What do you mean by, "stops cold?" I have no problem with backing >> >> this >> >> >>out...but I like Mezz's suggestion, too. >> >> >>>end of "Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update" from Joe Marcus Clarke >> << >> >> > >> >> >I mean nothing will build against it. >> >> >> >> Which part did it failed? Right now, I am building x11/gnome2 (2.5.x) >> >> and >> >> so far it looks good compile w/ gettext 0.13. It's on the gnomepanel >> >> part >> >> now, it will be around two to three hours to finish. I wrote a simple >> >> shell script (attaching) to do the work edit all >> /usr/ports/*/*/Makefile >> >> that has gettext in it. However, when the build is done and I do the >> >> test, >> >> then I will let everybody know the result. >> >>> end of "Re: HEADS UP: New gettext update" from Jeremy Messenger << >> > >> > I think the problem was caused by something else. I'm now logging my >> > builds with 2>&1... dunno why I wasn't before. >> > >> > I have 2 more builds to test stuff before I try a gettext-0.13 one. >> > It'll be a few days but I'll give it a better whirl. >> >> Here's result: It compiles and runs with gettext 0.13 great, no problem >> so >> far with Gnome 2.5.x and other apps. > > Great! Thanks for testing. Trevor has given me a patch that chases > gettext in all affected ports, so I will most likely test that on the > next 4-exp build. No problem, I just saw we have another update of gettext but I think it shouldn't make any difference between 0.13.0 and 0.13.1.. Cheers, Mezz > Joe > >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >> > # Adam >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Adam Weinberger >> > adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net >> > http://www.vectors.cx -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr2ba65bb8ckrg5>