From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 25 6: 4:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from dillema.net (server.pasta.cs.UiT.No [129.242.16.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAFA37B400 for ; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 06:04:39 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillema@localhost) by dillema.net (8.11.2/8.8.8) id f0PE4Fr13065; Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:04:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2001 15:04:14 +0100 From: Feico Dillema To: snap-users@kame.net Cc: Matt Dillon , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 3972) TI-RPC, IPv6 and NFS (was: Re: strong recommendation re: NFS) Message-ID: <20010125150414.B13004@pasta.cs.uit.no> Mail-Followup-To: snap-users@kame.net, Matt Dillon , freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <200101241851.f0OIpSk69419@earth.backplane.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Ronald.vanderPol@surfnet.nl on Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:40:22PM +0100 X-Operating-System: NetBSD drifter.dillema.net 1.5Q NetBSD 1.5Q (DRIFTER-CB) X-URL: http://www.dillema.net/ Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 02:40:22PM +0100, Ronald van der Pol wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Matt Dillon wrote: > > (I have cc-ed snap-users@kame.net) > > This came up about half a year ago in the KAME snap mailing list. > I think the conclusion was: a migration from "old" RPC to TI-RPC > is a pre-requisite for making NFS IPv6 aware. > > So, I was wondering whether a switch to TI-RPC is planned. I know > it is a major task. I don't think this is within the KAME-project scope. On NetBSD, the NetBSD crowd has done this almost a year ago (I believe) and NFS over IPv6 works just great on NetBSD. I'd guess FreeBSD could borrow a lot from the NetBSD work, reducing the major-ness of the task? Feico. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message