From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 7 11:52:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C25E1681 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 11:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF3CE270 for ; Sat, 7 Mar 2015 11:52:09 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NKU0060PBVCEM00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 03:57:14 -0800 (PST) Message-id: <54FAE666.606@sorbs.net> Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 12:52:06 +0100 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS Deadlock? References: <54FAD0B2.8060601@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAD47B.7090007@sorbs.net> <54FADEBF.2060905@multiplay.co.uk> <54FAE018.8080509@sorbs.net> <54FAE513.3030107@multiplay.co.uk> In-reply-to: <54FAE513.3030107@multiplay.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 11:52:09 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > > > On 07/03/2015 11:25, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> Steven Hartland wrote: >>> >>> On 07/03/2015 10:35, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >>>> Steven Hartland wrote: >>>>> There are lots of fixes for ZFS issues in 10 so I'd recommend updated >>>>> to 10.1-RELEASE to see if you issue is already resolved there. >>>>> >>>> Question is will the fixes be applied to 9.4? Will there be a 9.4? >>>> >>> Unlikely I now any changes I've been doing I've only been MFC'ing to >>> 10 not 9 or 8. >> I wouldn't expect 8 being that it's already at 8.4 therefore no more >> releases just patches... but are we not getting a 9.4? Should not the >> known issues that have been addresses have their fixes integrated? >> > I couldn't comment on if there will be a 9.4, even if there is I > wouldn't expect all the fixes that are in 10 to be present if I'm > honest, the team only has so much time so prioritising the latest > releases is just something that's going to have to happen. > > We're already had 10 and now 10.1 I'd say its time to upgrade ;-) > Unfortunately 10.x is out of the question at the moment, and is likely to be for sometime. I guess we need a statement on 9.4 as there are many of us waiting for it as possibly our last FreeBSD release. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/