From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Oct 21 10:18:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07043153723 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46xXf66Ddjz443v for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D393C153722; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D351C153721 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46xXf65B7xz443t for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9595F227BF for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9LAIM7I078775 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x9LAIMOq078774 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 241347] security/sssd: Update to 1.16.4 Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: lukas.slebodnik@intrak.sk X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:18:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D241347 --- Comment #5 from lukas.slebodnik@intrak.sk --- (In reply to Phillip R. Jaenke from comment #3) > All that said, Lukas, can this build with python3.6+? FreeBSD is EOL'ing = 2.7 much more aggressively than RH. So I would recommend building only with= 3.x if possible so it doesn't come up as broken in January. My patch enforce python3 and disable python2 by default. Upstream tests python3.4+ so python3.6 should be fine I would probably need to update port to not rely on pyhton3 but directly use python3.6. Is that what you want? > The other concern I have is around the security/krb5 and samba dependency= . We don't have a good way to enforce option dependencies in other ports. I= think this can be worked around by depending on ${LOCALBASE}/lib/shared-mo= dules/krb5/winbind_krb5_localauth.so and ${LOCALBASE}/lib/samba4/krb5/plugi= ns/kdb/samba.so which are only present when GSSAPI_MIT is selected in samba= 48+. That SHOULD prevent user foot-shooting by installing a GSSAPI_BUILTIN = samba48+ against sssd here. Do I understand that you worry about mixing MIT krb5 and heimdal when build= ing with samba ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=