From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jan 31 02:55:34 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA25964
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 31 Jan 1998 02:55:34 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA25957;
          Sat, 31 Jan 1998 02:55:30 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA04921;
	Sat, 31 Jan 1998 11:51:25 +0100 (CET)
To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG
cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, tlambert@primenet.com,
        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 31 Jan 1998 05:15:17 EST."
             <199801311015.FAA06245@dyson.iquest.net> 
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 11:51:25 +0100
Message-ID: <4919.886243885@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG
X-To-Unsubscribe: mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org "unsubscribe current"

In message <199801311015.FAA06245@dyson.iquest.net>, "John S. Dyson" writes:

>> QED:  The attic is the right place.
>> 
>> And yes, personally I belive that portals & unionfs could go the same
>> way...
>> 
>Actually, portals and unionfs are *much* closer to being worked on.

... which is why they are not (yet) atticized  :-)

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
"Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!"