From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 08:17:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B97106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88E514E488; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F51D392.8080605@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:17:22 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" References: <4F4BA7CE.20107@FreeBSD.org> <20120303010602.6daeb272@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120303010602.6daeb272@cox.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade -> portmaster Rosetta Stone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:17:23 -0000 On 3/2/2012 11:06 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > Doug, is there a way to emulate portupgrade's "-k" (keep going) option, > to have the remaining list of ports to be built still continue > processing even if one port's build fails? You haven't missed it, the answer is no. It's part of that "portmaster can't read minds" problem that if something fails, I have no way of knowing if the rest of the updates should stop as a result. I may add it someday, but it's not trivial, and it's not a priority. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection