From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 9 17:50:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D17855CC for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x231.google.com (mail-ve0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D35F17D1 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 17:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id sa20so2343564veb.22 for ; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:50:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=guxkrpLJvQWgHaeG5Z+elpFXqf8QtEwf3ctS1stfh6U=; b=NX58biVRVarz30zH1Dt+VVmBRxPSnvt9esv3AcQ/jiTPT1EdK0NQmLe4XrjH6gKxGF 575AOOqr4odsbiVJ1jKrewQX/u5RFHgszWfjuB8AfKM1rfE/GmBAKnYAupRCXHwJ2gG2 NCZHdUZjX/sryCJLEuw6um73A6AlvydvYwlu5H02KqG3dhMVOUNNu0ZV9G6cQm0Z5xol 88DeWcJEGBrLBw+KxBgg80ZC1ezTrlG7c0msLxmzdAnwYP+atgdeJ0fs8+67GrVvaO9o InV3gRLVUcQS9+50eOOY9CdD0zKMYyskBR6VUfAxY8rSH0sLGiYsRZ+QOAi6Cbiw+PXK jJ6A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.181.170 with SMTP id dx10mr1941286vec.25.1397065833667; Wed, 09 Apr 2014 10:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.221.39.130 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:50:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <9eeba1ab-2ab0-4188-82aa-686c5573a5db@me.com> <8D81F198-36A7-47F4-B486-DA059910A6B4@spam.lifeforms.nl> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 18:50:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal From: Pawel Biernacki To: jungleboogie0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Kimmo Paasiala , Walter Hop , =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:50:34 -0000 On 9 April 2014 17:28, jungleboogie0 wrote: > > Please let us not forget that kernel.org was hacked and not detected > for 17 days: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/31/linux_kernel_security_breach/ I don't know why you're bringing it up here, because FreeBSD had similar problem some time ago (http://www.freebsd.org/news/2012-compromise.html) and I think that we had learnt a lot from it. > I would rather was 24 hours for a fix that's been verified and > reviewed over having to re-update the system. It looks like many linux > distros had this updated before > freeBSD but its a matter of hours we're talking about. > -- One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.