Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 16:05:51 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Gustavo V G C Rios <kernel@lince.tdnet.com.br> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Message-ID: <200004072205.QAA02515@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Apr 2000 12:18:17 -0000." <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br> References: <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br> <38ED128C.22C3AA28@tdnet.com.br> <20000406192206.N22104@fw.wintelcom.net> <38ED233E.74716D02@tdnet.com.br> <20000406230234.B4381@fw.wintelcom.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br> Gustavo V G C Rios writes: : All other tasks would run in like any other user process, like a fyle : system daemon, process daemon , internet daemon (not inetd), and, of : course, device drivers programs. This still won't stop you from wedging the machine absoltely solid by programming a chip on the PCI bus in a bad way which hangs the PCI bus. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200004072205.QAA02515>