From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 30 07:29:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA28817 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 07:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA28805 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 07:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by who.cdrom.com (8.8.5/8.6.11) with ESMTP id HAA05807 for ; Wed, 30 Apr 1997 07:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199704301429.HAA05807@who.cdrom.com> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA019560513; Thu, 1 May 1997 00:28:33 +1000 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: Unloading LKMs (was Re: A Desparate Plea for Help...) To: dfr@nlsystems.com (Doug Rabson) Date: Thu, 1 May 1997 00:28:32 +1000 (EST) Cc: avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au, bde@zeta.org.au, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: from "Doug Rabson" at Apr 30, 97 03:28:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In some mail from Doug Rabson, sie said: > > On Wed, 30 Apr 1997, Darren Reed wrote: > > > IMHO, the driver should need to know zero about devsw tables, etc. > > > > With people suggesting more and more ad hoc changes, that mean more > > work for me, I seriously have to wonder "is it worth the effort ?" > > Compared to 2.2 and current, my new system will mean less work for you. bonus! (I hope :)