Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:15:30 -0700 From: Tim Kientzle <tim@kientzle.com> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ubldr vs ubldr.bin? Message-ID: <D31CC1FC-4D0F-456A-BBD6-BD6CEC31B2F1@kientzle.com> In-Reply-To: <1436978285.1334.335.camel@freebsd.org> References: <op.x1tfyc2ckndu52@53555a16.cm-6-6b.dynamic.ziggo.nl> <1436978285.1334.335.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Jul 15, 2015, at 9:38 AM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > ubldr.bin is a raw executable image > (no elf headers) which is self-relocating and can be loaded at any > address. =E2=80=A6 a common armv6[hf] userland that runs > on any board. Previously the single userland difference between = various > arm boards is that UBLDR_LOADADDR was different for each board. Wonderful! Nice work. > =E2=80=A6 and ubldr is still > being built only for compatibility with people that have older u-boot > installed. Hmmm=E2=80=A6. I wonder how Crochet should handle this. Plenty of = folks use Crochet to build 10-STABLE and 10.1 images, so we have to be a = little careful about jumping ahead with new features that are only = available in 11-CURRENT. Any plans to MFC this? Tim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D31CC1FC-4D0F-456A-BBD6-BD6CEC31B2F1>