From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jun  8 02:03:47 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA29568
          for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 02:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA29558;
          Mon, 8 Jun 1998 02:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (sjx-ca115-10.ix.netcom.com [207.223.162.74]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA09671; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 02:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/8.6.9) id CAA03612; Mon, 8 Jun 1998 02:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 02:03:19 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199806080903.CAA03612@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: donburr@inreach.com
CC: dburr@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
        brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu
In-reply-to: <XFMail.980607193308.donburr@inreach.com> (message from Donald Burr on Sun, 07 Jun 1998 19:33:08 -0700 (PDT))
Subject: Re: ports/6886
From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * Does this justify a port of its own, or should it be rolled into the main
 * GIMP port (respecting NOPORTDOCS, of course)?
 * 
 * I don't mind doing either one, but I figured I should probably ask for
 * opinions first, because (for obvious reasons) I really want to DTRT the
 * first time around, :)

Depends on the size.  We don't build packages with NOPORTDOCS, so the
gimp package will have all the stuff in there.  If that makes it too
big, make it a separate port.

Satoshi

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message